My theory, let the winning team on a challenge get a HUGE reward and let them vote off someone from the losing team! Someone has to be voted off anyway, and this could really shake things up. Before doing the challenge, it could be said there is a twist and it will be revealed after the challenge. Once the challenge is won, it could then be said that the 'twist' is there will be an immediate tribal counsel held in which the winning team gets to vote off someone from the losing team on the challenge. Chaos, excitement, panic, concerns.. the ultimate chance to definately outwit, outlast, and outplay.. true to survivor! This has to be done at least once.. and what a reward!! Most often we see the tribes sitting out their 'weakest' players on a challenge and saving their 'strongest' players for the immunity challenge. If this idea goes into play at least once, it might make everyone rethink their strategies.. and <sigh> alliances. Because if this were to be done.. your best alliance is of absolutely no help to you what so ever. The ripple effect of the winning team on a challenge voting off someone from the losing team, could and should redefine the entire game, even if it was done only once! And if you must, you could still hold an immunity challenge later on in the game. Its been done before where there have been 2 people voted off in one night. Ive posted this thought and some either like it or not. Some seem to think its stupid because they would vote of the strongest player on the losing team, all i can say is.. DUH! Thats what it comes down to once the tribes merge anyway! Its worth at least one try, dont ya think?

9  out of 9 found this valuable. Do you find this valuable? Do you?    

Show Last Reply